Transformers Fanon Wiki:Featured Articles/Nominations

Featured articles

Nominations

Review Board

Featured Article History

Upcoming Featured Articles

What makes a featured article or what article should you nominate to feature? Things the article should have can be found here.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?.

---

Nomination:

To nominate an article place:

==[[Article's Name]]==
===Support===
===Oppose===
===Neutral===
===Comments===

Voting:

1. To vote place a # with your signature (~~~~)
2. Either support or object the article’s nomination
   1. Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.
4. In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

The win:

An article with the most votes wins. Also, articles within one vote will win. For example, an article wins with seven votes. Any article with six votes also wins. To If there is a tie between two or more articles the article with the least oppositions wins. For example, two articles tie with seven votes. One article has two oppositions and the other has none. The article with no oppositions wins. If an article is in the negatives or at zero, it doesn't win.

After the win:

When an article wins, it will be added to the list of featured articles, the upcoming article queue, and to the history of featured articles.

Current Standings

Ducimus (2)

Entropa (2)

Autobot Tak (-1)

Nominations

If the articles presented do not follow the policies given on the Transformer Fanon Wiki, they will not featured, regardless of the number of votes. The Policies are listed below. An article must...

1. …be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on the Transformers Fanon Wiki.
2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
3. …all images should be captioned.
4. …be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
5. …be correctly categorized.
6. …not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
7. …have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page featured box.
8. …have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled.
9. …have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
10. …have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.

Please sign with a #, which gives a list, like this:

1. One
2. Two

Cheers, the Transfanon Wiki Staff

Autobot Tak (Review) (-1)

Support

1. I love this page. From the adorable picture, to the unintentional funny that Hasbro apparently lost the copyright to the name “Tak.” I’d like to see more pages like this. Stuff made by people who don’t think they’re doing the most important thing ever, but also doing this because they genuinely enjoy it. But mostly because I think that out of the three, this author is the only one who could actually use the encouragement. It’s not a featured article now, but one day it could be. Sarrc 17:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Sorry dude, but

1. …be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on the Transformers Fanon Wiki.

5. …be correctly categorized.

7. …have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page featured box.

10. …have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.

It was a good try, and maybe when it is older and worked on more. Again, sorry. General Grham ^{Talk to me. NCIS Wiki} 00:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

1. Sorry man. See RB Review.—Darthtyler_Talk 13:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Meh, its my first article, why not enter it? :P Tak 16:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Entropa (Review) (2)

Support

1. --ItsWalky 17:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2. --Rotty 17:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
3. --Suki Brits 20:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

"Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed."

—Above under Voting

General Grham ^{Talk to me. NCIS Wiki} 12:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

1. I'm supporting, but please realize that its only because the FA stuff is new. If FA's have been around for a while, it would have way to many redlinks. Right now, I like it. So I'll go ahead and vote (thus crossing out my oppose, because it follows the policies.) Phobi^{Speak To the Almighty...} 01:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Look at the Main Page for FAs. It doesn't have some of the things needed.

1. …be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on the Transformers Fanon Wiki.

Now it has 1 link, but it still needs some other stuff. General Grham ^{Talk to me. NCIS Wiki} 23:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

8. …have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled.

10. …have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.

Sorry. General Grham ^{Talk to me. NCIS Wiki} 00:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

1. Sorry, but no. It just doesn't look like FA material.—Darthtyler_Talk 13:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Why, does it have to be a repainted Optimus Prime? --ItsWalky 14:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Are you the same person as Rotty?—Darthtyler_Talk 14:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Hahaha, no. How old are you? --ItsWalky 15:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Walky, you already know the answer to that. That's just kinda mean. --Suki Brits 20:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I would like everyone to know that I am also Suki Britz. --ItsWalky 20:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

No, I'm Spartacus! -Rotty 01:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

#The article is good, but it cannot be picked if it does not follow our policies. Your articles don't have to follow all the policies, but if you expect them to become FA's, they must. If your article is breaking a policy (one that is for every article), we will let you know on your talk page. Phobi^{Speak To the Almighty...} 01:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 21:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Ducimus (Review) (2)

Support

1. My best. It is the only article of mine that has a chance. I filled all the qualifications. General Grham ^{Talk to me. NCIS Wiki} 15:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
2. This is only article on the nomination queue that follows our policies. Phobi^{Speak To the Almighty...} 01:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 21:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. It’s a neat page, and I think the author did a really good job, but I really don’t see how it can currently be nominated for a featured article. I find it slightly confusing, it says he’s neutral, but that he sides with the Autobots, and then makes Autobots… and fights the Decepticons…. It links to several articles which do not meet the style guidelines, seeing as article titles must be singular, not plural. I’m not sure it meets requirement 2, as the overall tone is pretty biased. It goes on and on about how fantastic he is, while barely mentioning anything about when he essentially turned evil. This glosses over character flaws in favor of one perception of the character. I’m positive it doesn’t meet requirement 10, as there are no characteristics on his alt mode, save for a link to a page that has nothing on it.

Personally, I think we should scrap this whole feature article nomination and voting thing, until we have an actual consensus on a functional style guide. Sarrc 16:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral. See RB Review.—Darthtyler_Talk 15:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Hardcore (Review)

Support

1. Since we're all voting for stuff we wrote, I say GO ME THIS ARTICLE IS AWESOME. And if you disagree, then I say we rewrite the rules so that mine and only mine can win. -hx 18:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)